Rank Importance - Funding for Universities and Junior Colleges (September 2010)
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, " Below is a list of large items in the state budget that lawmakers can cut in order to address the expected budget gap. Please arrange these items according to how important it is to you that their current funding levels are preserved, with items that are most important to you nearer to the top and items least important to you nearer to the bottom. - Funding for universities and junior colleges"
| category | column-1 |
|---|---|
| Ranked first | 6% |
| Ranked second | 18% |
| Ranked third | 24% |
| Ranked fourth | 38% |
| Ranked fifth | 13% |
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, " Below is a list of large items in the state budget that lawmakers can cut in order to address the expected budget gap. Please arrange these items according to how important it is to you that their current funding levels are preserved, with items that are most important to you nearer to the top and items least important to you nearer to the bottom. - Funding for universities and junior colleges" Measurement of Party ID for this figure is based on two questions. First, respondents were asked whether they consider themselves to be a Democrats, Republicans, independents, other, or not sure. Those who responded that they are independents or "other" were then asked if they lean toward either the Democrats or Republicans. If they indicated that they lean toward one party or the other, they are considered Democrats or Republicans for the purposes of this figure. Only "pure" independents or members of a third party who indicate that they have no preference for Democrats vis-a-vis Republicans are considered independents. Respondents who answered that they are "not sure" for either of the two aforementioned questions are not incorporated into this figure.
| category | Democrat | Independent | Republican |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranked first | 6% | 7% | 7% |
| Ranked second | 23% | 28% | 13% |
| Ranked third | 25% | 31% | 22% |
| Ranked fourth | 39% | 28% | 40% |
| Ranked fifth | 8% | 6% | 17% |
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, " Below is a list of large items in the state budget that lawmakers can cut in order to address the expected budget gap. Please arrange these items according to how important it is to you that their current funding levels are preserved, with items that are most important to you nearer to the top and items least important to you nearer to the bottom. - Funding for universities and junior colleges" Party identification is calculated according to the PID7 variable, a seven point scale of party identification.
| category | Lean Republican | Not very strong Republican | Strong Republican |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranked first | 8% | 4% | 8% |
| Ranked second | 8% | 13% | 16% |
| Ranked third | 26% | 26% | 19% |
| Ranked fourth | 39% | 46% | 39% |
| Ranked fifth | 20% | 11% | 18% |
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, " Below is a list of large items in the state budget that lawmakers can cut in order to address the expected budget gap. Please arrange these items according to how important it is to you that their current funding levels are preserved, with items that are most important to you nearer to the top and items least important to you nearer to the bottom. - Funding for universities and junior colleges" Party identification is calculated according to the PID7 variable, a seven point scale of party identification.
| category | Lean Democrat | Not very strong Democrat | Strong Democrat |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranked first | 12% | 7% | 3% |
| Ranked second | 33% | 18% | 22% |
| Ranked third | 19% | 14% | 32% |
| Ranked fourth | 35% | 46% | 37% |
| Ranked fifth | 2% | 14% | 7% |
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, " Below is a list of large items in the state budget that lawmakers can cut in order to address the expected budget gap. Please arrange these items according to how important it is to you that their current funding levels are preserved, with items that are most important to you nearer to the top and items least important to you nearer to the bottom. - Funding for universities and junior colleges" Ideology is measured on a scale of 1-7, with 1 corresponding to "extremely liberal", 7 corresponding to "extremely conservative, and 4 corresponding to "in the middle." For the purposes of this table, respondents who placed themselves at or between points 1 and 3 on the scale are considered "liberal," respondents who placed themselves at point 4 on the scale are considered "moderate," and respondents who placed themselves at or between points 5 and 7 on the scale are considered conservative.
| category | Liberals | Moderates | Conservatives |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranked first | 6% | 4% | 7% |
| Ranked second | 21% | 18% | 17% |
| Ranked third | 33% | 24% | 21% |
| Ranked fourth | 32% | 46% | 39% |
| Ranked fifth | 7% | 8% | 17% |
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, " Below is a list of large items in the state budget that lawmakers can cut in order to address the expected budget gap. Please arrange these items according to how important it is to you that their current funding levels are preserved, with items that are most important to you nearer to the top and items least important to you nearer to the bottom. - Funding for universities and junior colleges" The ideology measure is based on respondent self-placement in response to the following question: "On a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 is extremely liberal, 7 is extremely conservative, and 4 is exactly in the middle, where would you place yourself?" The placements are further classified such that 1 is extremely liberal, 2 is very liberal, 3 is somewhat liberal, 4 is moderate, 5 is somewhat conservative, 6 is very conservative, and 7 is extremely conservative.
| category | Leaning conservative | Somewhat conservative | Extremely conservative |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranked first | 6% | 7% | 6% |
| Ranked second | 24% | 16% | 14% |
| Ranked third | 16% | 25% | 20% |
| Ranked fourth | 43% | 32% | 42% |
| Ranked fifth | 12% | 20% | 18% |
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, " Below is a list of large items in the state budget that lawmakers can cut in order to address the expected budget gap. Please arrange these items according to how important it is to you that their current funding levels are preserved, with items that are most important to you nearer to the top and items least important to you nearer to the bottom. - Funding for universities and junior colleges" The ideology measure is based on respondent self-placement in response to the following question: "On a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 is extremely liberal, 7 is extremely conservative, and 4 is exactly in the middle, where would you place yourself?" The placements are further classified such that 1 is extremely liberal, 2 is very liberal, 3 is somewhat liberal, 4 is moderate, 5 is somewhat conservative, 6 is very conservative, and 7 is extremely conservative.
| category | Leaning liberal | Somewhat liberal | Extremely liberal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranked first | 8% | 4% | 8% |
| Ranked second | 18% | 25% | 20% |
| Ranked third | 29% | 36% | 38% |
| Ranked fourth | 37% | 29% | 29% |
| Ranked fifth | 9% | 7% | 5% |
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, " Below is a list of large items in the state budget that lawmakers can cut in order to address the expected budget gap. Please arrange these items according to how important it is to you that their current funding levels are preserved, with items that are most important to you nearer to the top and items least important to you nearer to the bottom. - Funding for universities and junior colleges" Tea Party identification is based on the following question, also asked in the survey: "Suppose the Tea Party movement organized itself as a political party. When thinking about the next election for Congress, would you vote for the Republican candidate from your district, the Democratic candidate from your district, or the Tea Party candidate from your district?" Those who responded "Republican candidate" are considered Republicans (non-Tea Party movement) and those who responded "Tea Party candidate" are considered Tea Party Republicans.
| category | Democrat | Republican | Tea Party |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranked first | 5% | 11% | 5% |
| Ranked second | 24% | 17% | 12% |
| Ranked third | 26% | 20% | 22% |
| Ranked fourth | 37% | 39% | 40% |
| Ranked fifth | 7% | 13% | 21% |
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, " Below is a list of large items in the state budget that lawmakers can cut in order to address the expected budget gap. Please arrange these items according to how important it is to you that their current funding levels are preserved, with items that are most important to you nearer to the top and items least important to you nearer to the bottom. - Funding for universities and junior colleges" Race is calculated according to the RACE variable.
| category | White | Black | Hispanic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranked first | 7% | 4% | 6% |
| Ranked second | 17% | 15% | 25% |
| Ranked third | 25% | 29% | 22% |
| Ranked fourth | 37% | 46% | 37% |
| Ranked fifth | 14% | 7% | 10% |
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, " Below is a list of large items in the state budget that lawmakers can cut in order to address the expected budget gap. Please arrange these items according to how important it is to you that their current funding levels are preserved, with items that are most important to you nearer to the top and items least important to you nearer to the bottom. - Funding for universities and junior colleges" Gender is calculated according to the GENDER variable.
| category | Male | Female |
|---|---|---|
| Ranked first | 8% | 5% |
| Ranked second | 20% | 17% |
| Ranked third | 24% | 25% |
| Ranked fourth | 33% | 43% |
| Ranked fifth | 16% | 10% |
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, " Below is a list of large items in the state budget that lawmakers can cut in order to address the expected budget gap. Please arrange these items according to how important it is to you that their current funding levels are preserved, with items that are most important to you nearer to the top and items least important to you nearer to the bottom. - Funding for universities and junior colleges" Location is based on the following question, "Would you say that you live in an urban, suburban, or rural community?"
| category | Urban | Suburban | Rural |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranked first | 5% | 9% | 4% |
| Ranked second | 21% | 18% | 14% |
| Ranked third | 26% | 25% | 21% |
| Ranked fourth | 36% | 39% | 41% |
| Ranked fifth | 13% | 9% | 20% |
- Table |
- Share
- | More
Respondents were asked, " Below is a list of large items in the state budget that lawmakers can cut in order to address the expected budget gap. Please arrange these items according to how important it is to you that their current funding levels are preserved, with items that are most important to you nearer to the top and items least important to you nearer to the bottom. - Funding for universities and junior colleges" Education is calculated according to the EDUC variable.
| category | No high school | High school graduate | Some college | 2-year | 4-year | Post-grad |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranked first | 0% | 3% | 8% | 9% | 9% | 10% |
| Ranked second | 14% | 17% | 18% | 14% | 22% | 24% |
| Ranked third | 24% | 21% | 28% | 22% | 27% | 23% |
| Ranked fourth | 42% | 44% | 36% | 45% | 28% | 30% |
| Ranked fifth | 20% | 15% | 10% | 10% | 14% | 13% |
