Seriousness - People Voting Multiple Times (October 2016)

Seriousness - People Voting Multiple Times (October 2016)

  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Likely voters were asked, "How serious a problem do you think each of the following will be in the 2016 elections? - People voting multiple times."
    "Likely Voters" were defined as those who indicated that they were either certain to vote in Q3A or have voted in every election in Q3.

Loading chart...
categorycolumn-1
Extremely serious39%
Somewhat serious16%
Not too serious13%
Not serious at all29%
Don't know3%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Likely voters were asked, "How serious a problem do you think each of the following will be in the 2016 elections? - People voting multiple times."
    "Likely Voters" were defined as those who indicated that they were either certain to vote in Q3A or have voted in every election in Q3. Trump voters are those respondents who have indicated that they will be voting for Donald Trump in Q17.

Loading chart...
categoryNot supporting Donald TrumpSupporting Donald Trump
Extremely serious18%64%
Somewhat serious10%25%
Not too serious17%8%
Not serious at all51%3%
Don't know4%1%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Likely voters were asked, "How serious a problem do you think each of the following will be in the 2016 elections? - People voting multiple times."
    "Likely Voters" were defined as those who indicated that they were either certain to vote in Q3A or have voted in every election in Q3. Clinton voters is based on those who have indicated that they will be voting for Hillary Clinton in Q17.
Loading chart...
categoryNot supporting Hillary ClintonSupporting Hillary Clinton
Extremely serious56%14%
Somewhat serious23%8%
Not too serious11%15%
Not serious at all8%60%
Don't know3%3%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Likely voters were asked, "How serious a problem do you think each of the following will be in the 2016 elections? - People voting multiple times."
    "Likely Voters" were defined as those who indicated that they were either certain to vote in Q3A or have voted in every election in Q3.
    Measurement of Party ID for this figure is based on two questions. First, respondents were asked whether they consider themselves to be a Democrats, Republicans, independents, other, or not sure. Those who responded that they are independents or "other" were then asked if they lean toward either the Democrats or Republicans. If they indicated that they lean toward one party or the other, they are considered Democrats or Republicans for the purposes of this figure. Only "pure" independents or members of a third party who indicate that they have no preference for Democrats vis-a-vis Republicans are considered independents. Respondents who answered that they are "not sure" for either of the two aforementioned questions are not incorporated into this figure.
Loading chart...
categoryDemocratIndependentRepublican
Extremely serious16%47%59%
Somewhat serious8%14%24%
Not too serious15%17%8%
Not serious at all58%19%6%
Don't know2%3%3%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Likely voters were asked, "How serious a problem do you think each of the following will be in the 2016 elections? - People voting multiple times."
    "Likely Voters" were defined as those who indicated that they were either certain to vote in Q3A or have voted in every election in Q3.
    Party identification is calculated according to the PID7 variable, a seven point scale of party identification.
Loading chart...
categoryLean RepublicanNot very strong RepublicanStrong Republican
Extremely serious64%47%62%
Somewhat serious19%25%26%
Not too serious9%13%6%
Not serious at all8%12%2%
Don't know0%4%4%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Likely voters were asked, "How serious a problem do you think each of the following will be in the 2016 elections? - People voting multiple times."
    "Likely Voters" were defined as those who indicated that they were either certain to vote in Q3A or have voted in every election in Q3.
    Party identification is calculated according to the PID7 variable, a seven point scale of party identification.
Loading chart...
categoryLean DemocratNot very strong DemocratStrong Democrat
Extremely serious15%12%18%
Somewhat serious8%4%9%
Not too serious11%23%14%
Not serious at all64%61%55%
Don't know2%0%4%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Likely voters were asked, "How serious a problem do you think each of the following will be in the 2016 elections? - People voting multiple times."
    "Likely Voters" were defined as those who indicated that they were either certain to vote in Q3A or have voted in every election in Q3.
    Ideology is measured on a scale of 1-7, with 1 corresponding to "extremely liberal", 7 corresponding to "extremely conservative, and 4 corresponding to "in the middle." For the purposes of this table, respondents who placed themselves at or between points 1 and 3 on the scale are considered "liberal," respondents who placed themselves at point 4 on the scale are considered "moderate," and respondents who placed themselves at or between points 5 and 7 on the scale are considered conservative.
Loading chart...
categoryLiberalsModeratesConservatives
Extremely serious9%27%60%
Somewhat serious7%16%21%
Not too serious13%19%9%
Not serious at all70%34%9%
Don't know2%5%1%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Likely voters were asked, "How serious a problem do you think each of the following will be in the 2016 elections? - People voting multiple times."
    "Likely Voters" were defined as those who indicated that they were either certain to vote in Q3A or have voted in every election in Q3.
    The ideology measure is based on respondent self-placement in response to the following question: "On a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 is extremely liberal, 7 is extremely conservative, and 4 is exactly in the middle, where would you place yourself?" The placements are further classified such that 1 is extremely liberal, 2 is very liberal, 3 is somewhat liberal, 4 is moderate, 5 is somewhat conservative, 6 is very conservative, and 7 is extremely conservative.
Loading chart...
categoryLeaning conservativeSomewhat conservativeExtremely conservative
Extremely serious42%55%74%
Somewhat serious21%24%18%
Not too serious9%13%5%
Not serious at all25%8%2%
Don't know3%1%1%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Likely voters were asked, "How serious a problem do you think each of the following will be in the 2016 elections? - People voting multiple times."
    "Likely Voters" were defined as those who indicated that they were either certain to vote in Q3A or have voted in every election in Q3.
    The ideology measure is based on respondent self-placement in response to the following question: "On a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 is extremely liberal, 7 is extremely conservative, and 4 is exactly in the middle, where would you place yourself?" The placements are further classified such that 1 is extremely liberal, 2 is very liberal, 3 is somewhat liberal, 4 is moderate, 5 is somewhat conservative, 6 is very conservative, and 7 is extremely conservative.
Loading chart...
categoryLeaning liberalSomewhat liberalExtremely liberal
Extremely serious2%8%15%
Somewhat serious5%8%6%
Not too serious16%10%14%
Not serious at all72%74%63%
Don't know5%1%0%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Likely voters were asked, "How serious a problem do you think each of the following will be in the 2016 elections? - People voting multiple times."
    "Likely Voters" were defined as those who indicated that they were either certain to vote in Q3A or have voted in every election in Q3.
    Tea Party identification is based on the following question, also asked in the survey: "Suppose the Tea Party movement organized itself as a political party. When thinking about the next election for Congress, would you vote for the Republican candidate from your district, the Democratic candidate from your district, or the Tea Party candidate from your district?" Those who responded "Republican candidate" are considered Republicans (non-Tea Party movement) and those who responded "Tea Party candidate" are considered Tea Party Republicans.
Loading chart...
categoryDemocratRepublicanTea Party
Extremely serious14%56%69%
Somewhat serious8%20%19%
Not too serious13%11%8%
Not serious at all61%13%3%
Don't know3%1%1%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Likely voters were asked, "How serious a problem do you think each of the following will be in the 2016 elections? - People voting multiple times."
    "Likely Voters" were defined as those who indicated that they were either certain to vote in Q3A or have voted in every election in Q3.
    Race is calculated according to the race variable.
Loading chart...
categoryWhiteBlackHispanic
Extremely serious41%32%35%
Somewhat serious19%9%15%
Not too serious11%10%19%
Not serious at all25%47%31%
Don't know4%2%1%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Likely voters were asked, "How serious a problem do you think each of the following will be in the 2016 elections? - People voting multiple times."
    "Likely Voters" were defined as those who indicated that they were either certain to vote in Q3A or have voted in every election in Q3.
    Gender is calculated according to the GENDER variable.
Loading chart...
categoryMaleFemale
Extremely serious40%38%
Somewhat serious17%16%
Not too serious9%17%
Not serious at all32%26%
Don't know3%2%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Likely voters were asked, "How serious a problem do you think each of the following will be in the 2016 elections? - People voting multiple times."
    "Likely Voters" were defined as those who indicated that they were either certain to vote in Q3A or have voted in every election in Q3.
    Community is based on the following question, " Would you say that you live in an urban, suburban, or rural community?"
Loading chart...
categoryUrbanSuburbanRural
Extremely serious28%40%50%
Somewhat serious14%15%21%
Not too serious17%12%10%
Not serious at all38%31%14%
Don't know2%2%6%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Likely voters were asked, "How serious a problem do you think each of the following will be in the 2016 elections? - People voting multiple times."
    "Likely Voters" were defined as those who indicated that they were either certain to vote in Q3A or have voted in every election in Q3.
    Age is calculated according to the AGEG variable.
Loading chart...
category18-2930-4445-6465+
Extremely serious29%32%42%50%
Somewhat serious14%15%18%16%
Not too serious18%15%9%12%
Not serious at all35%35%28%19%
Don't know4%2%2%2%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Likely voters were asked, "How serious a problem do you think each of the following will be in the 2016 elections? - People voting multiple times."
    "Likely Voters" were defined as those who indicated that they were either certain to vote in Q3A or have voted in every election in Q3.
    Education is calculated according to the EDUC variable.
Loading chart...
categoryNo high schoolHigh school graduateSome college2-year4-yearPost-grad
Extremely serious42%45%32%41%40%36%
Somewhat serious10%19%17%21%16%10%
Not too serious8%16%15%9%11%7%
Not serious at all41%16%34%27%32%43%
Don't know0%5%2%2%1%3%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Likely voters were asked, "How serious a problem do you think each of the following will be in the 2016 elections? - People voting multiple times."
    "Likely Voters" were defined as those who indicated that they were either certain to vote in Q3A or have voted in every election in Q3. Religiosity is calculated according to the IMPORT variable.
Loading chart...
categoryExtremely importantSomewhat importantNot very importantNot at all important
Extremely serious51%40%23%19%
Somewhat serious19%20%12%7%
Not too serious12%14%13%13%
Not serious at all16%25%44%58%
Don't know2%1%7%2%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Likely voters were asked, "How serious a problem do you think each of the following will be in the 2016 elections? - People voting multiple times."
    "Likely Voters" were defined as those who indicated that they were either certain to vote in Q3A or have voted in every election in Q3. Fundamentalism is calculated according to the LITERAL variable.
Loading chart...
categoryThe Bible is the word of God, to be taken literallyThe Bible is the word of God, not to be taken literallyThe Bible is a book written by men
Extremely serious55%42%17%
Somewhat serious20%19%11%
Not too serious11%12%15%
Not serious at all12%25%55%
Don't know2%2%1%
  • Table |
  • Share
  • |
    More

    Likely voters were asked, "How serious a problem do you think each of the following will be in the 2016 elections? - People voting multiple times."
    "Likely Voters" were defined as those who indicated that they were either certain to vote in Q3A or have voted in every election in Q3. College is based on those who have recieved a 4-year college education or a post-graduate education according to the EDUC variable.

Loading chart...
categoryNo College EducationCollege Educated
Extremely serious39%39%
Somewhat serious18%14%
Not too serious14%10%
Not serious at all26%36%
Don't know3%2%

Latest Poll News

June 2023 University of Texas/Texas Politics Project Poll

The June 2023 University of Texas / Texas Politics Project poll included extensive questioning about the performance of state leaders during the 2023 Legislative session.
State on the Wrong Track

For only the second time in UT polling, but the second time in less than a year, a majority of Texas voters say that the state is on the wrong track.
Inflation on Texans' minds

More than half of Texans think the state is on the wrong track, while border security and immigration continue to loom large, especially among Texas Republicans.
June 2021 University of Texas/Texas Tribune Poll

The latest University of Texas/Texas Tribune poll has been released in full. Check out the latest poll page to explore results related to the 87th legislative session, the coronavirus pandemic, assessments of state leaders, and more.
March 2021 Texas Politics Project/UT Energy Institute Poll

The Texas Politics Project just released the results of a March poll developed in conjunction with a team of researchers at the UT Energy Institute that asked dozens of questions about Texans’ experience during the winter storm, their attitudes toward causes and consequences of the storm, their views of, and expectations about, possible policy responses, and their views of how a wide range of actors from their neighbors and utility providers to state political leaders, regulatory bodies, and corporate actors. 

Related Results